The Implementation of the Plead Accreditation Policy on Public Satisfaction at the Medan Selayang Community Health Center

Penulis

  • Agung Kacaribu Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Tunggul Sihombing Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Simson Ginting Universitas Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/cjas.v3i12.113

Kata Kunci:

Paripurna Accreditation, Policy Implementation, Edwards III, Community Satisfaction, Medan Selayang Health Canter

Abstrak

This study aims to analyze the influence of the implementation of Paripurna accreditation policies on community satisfaction at Puskesmas Medan Selayang, using four main dimensions based on George C. Edward III’s theory: communication, resources, disposition, and bureaucratic structure. This research employs a quantitative approach with the Structural Equation Modeling Partial Least Square (SEM-PLS) method. The sample consists of community members who accessed services at Puskesmas Medan Selayang and was selected using a purposive sampling technique. Data were analyzed using SmartPLS software to examine the relationships among variables simultaneously. The results show that communication, resources, disposition, and bureaucratic structure all have a positive and significant effect on community satisfaction. Overall, the implementation of the Paripurna accreditation policy has a positive and significant influence on community satisfaction, indicating that the success of accreditation is not only determined by the fulfillment of standard documents but also by the effectiveness of its implementation in practice. These findings emphasize that improving community satisfaction at Puskesmas Medan Selayang is more strongly influenced by the quality of internal communication, resource readiness, the commitment of health personnel, and a well-organized bureaucratic structure. Therefore, efforts to improve the quality of health services require strengthening accreditation implementation continuously to achieve public services that are safe, effective, and responsive to community needs.

Referensi

Agustino, Leo. (2016). Dasar-Dasar Implementasi Kebijakan Publik. Alfabeta

Ayudia, S., Nadeak, B., & Suyaman, D. J. (2021). Evaluasi Mutu Pelayanan Puskesmas Terakreditasi Berdasarkan Indeks Kepuasan Masyarakat Di Kabupaten Karawang. Syntax Literate; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 6(6), 3037- 3048.

Dawanson, D., & Arifin, J. (2021). Analisis Perbedaan Kualitas Pelayanan Sebelum dan Sesudah Akreditasi di UPTD Puskesmas Telang Siong Kecamatan Paju Epat Kabupaten Barito Timur. JAPB, 4(2), 1029-1040.

Ensha, I. S. (2018). Pengaruh Implementasi Kebijakan Akreditasi Puskesmas terhadap Manajemen Pelayanan Kesehatan Masyarakat dalam Mewujudkan Produktivitas Kerja. Jurnal Publik: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 12(01), 12–23. https://journal.uniga.ac.id/index.php/JPB/article/view/283

Faridah, F., & Arifin, J. (2021). Analisis Perbedaan Kualitas Pelayanan Sebelum Dan Sesudah Akreditasi Di UPTD Puskesmas Ampah Kecamatan Dusun Tengah Kabupaten Barito Timur. JAPB, 4(1), 456-466.

Grindle, Merilee S. 1980. Politics and Policy Implementation in the Third World. New Jersey: Princeton University Press

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., dan Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial. Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (Ed. 2). United: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Henry Simamora. (2016). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: STIE YKPN.

Misnaniarti, M., & Destari, P. K. (2018). Aspek penting akreditasi puskesmas dalam mendukung implementasi jaminan kesehatan nasional. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pelayanan Kesehatan, 10-16.

Mulyadi, Deddy, 2015, Studi Kebijakan Publik dan Pelayanan Publik Konsep dan aplikasi proses kebijakan dan pelayanan publik. Alfabeta: Bandung.

Oktalisya, V., & Ardansyah. (2023). Pengaruh Manajemen Pelayanan dan Produktivitas Kerja Pegawai Terhadap Akreditasi UPT Puskesmas Segala Mider Bandar Lampung. Jurnal EMT KITA, 7(4), 1184–1189. https://doi.org/10.35870/emt.v7i4.1616

Phonna, C. D., Sari, D. R., Nuryanti, A., & Karo, D. B. (2021). Persepsi Perawat Tentang Dampak Akreditasi Terhadap Mutu Pelayanan Kesehatan. The Journal of Hospital Accreditation, 3(2), 79-83.

Reganata, G. P., & Wirajaya, M. K. M. (2020). Akreditasi Puskesmas Sebagai Intervening Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap Kepuasan Pasien. Bali Health Journal, 4(2), 89-97.

Sambo, S. W., & Amelia, I. M. (2024). Analisis Pengaruh Sistem Akreditasi Terhadap Peningkatan Kualitas Pelayanan. AL-MIKRAJ Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora (E-ISSN 2745-4584), 5(01), 581-591.

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta

Trisna, I. N. P., & Raharjo, B. B. (2019). Status akreditasi puskesmas dengan tingkat kepuasan pasien. HIGEIA (Journal of Public Health Research and Development), 3(2), 324-336.

Utami, S. N., & Lubis, S. (2021). Efektivitas Akreditasi Puskesmas Terhadap Kualitas Puskesmas Medan Helvetia. Publik Reform, 8(2), 10-21.

Wulandari, R. D., Ridho, I. A., Supriyanto, S., Qomarrudin, M. B., Damayanti, N. A., Laksono, A. D., & Rassa, A. N. F. (2019). The Influence of Primary Health Care Accreditation on Patient Satisfaction. Media Kesehatan Masyarakat Indonesia, 15(3), 228–236. https://doi.org/10.30597/mkmi.v15i3.6195

Diterbitkan

2025-12-31

Terbitan

Bagian

Articles