Enhancing Indonesian Language Politeness at UNITRI Through Indonesian Language Courses: A Campus Impact Program Approach

Penulis

  • Muhammad Yusi Kamhar Universitas Tribhuwana Tunggadewi
  • Erma Lestari Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/cjas.v4i6.173

Kata Kunci:

Indonesian Language Politeness, Campus Impact Program, UNITRI, Language Learning, Cross-Cultural Students

Abstrak

This study investigates the enhancement of Indonesian language politeness among students at Universitas Tribhuwana Tunggadewi (UNITRI) Malang through the Indonesian Language course as part of a Campus Impact Program (Program Kampus Berdampak). Using a qualitative descriptive approach, this study examines politeness development across three interactional domains: student-lecturer communication, peer interaction, and digital communication via WhatsApp. Data were collected through classroom observation, interview, and documentation involving 40 students from cross-cultural backgrounds. Findings show that structured instruction in politeness strategies within the Indonesian Language course significantly improves students’ command of positive and negative politeness, particularly in formal academic contexts. The Campus Impact Program framework provides an enabling environment for contextualised, values-based language learning that extends beyond the classroom. The study concludes that the Indonesian Language course, when oriented toward real-world campus impact, functions as an effective vehicle for cultivating a culture of linguistic politeness among multicultural students.

Referensi

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press. Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269–293). Penguin. Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Blackwell. Kemendikbudristek. (2023). Panduan Program Kampus Berdampak. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset dan Teknologi.American Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.7.581

Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge University Press.American Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34

Markhamah. (2009). Analisis kesalahan berbahasa dan kesantunan berbahasa. Muhammadiyah University Press. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHRH-08-2017-0040

Rahardi, K. (2005). Pragmatik: Kesantunan imperatif bahasa Indonesia. Erlangga. Rohimah, S. N. (2024). Multicultural representation in linguistic landscapes: An anthropolinguistic study of Sampit, Central Kalimantan. Universitas Negeri Surabaya. Sugono, D. (2003). Buku praktis bahasa Indonesia. Pusat Bahasa Depdiknas. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.National Bureau of Economic Research, 358–380. Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/papers/w15352.pdf

Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (1995). Intercultural communication: A discourse approach. Blackwell.Crosscultural Communication. https://doi.org/10.3968/j.ccc.1923670020100603.009

Diterbitkan

2026-07-24

Terbitan

Bagian

Articles