Risk Analysis of Precast Concrete Pouring Process Using Hazop (Hazard and Operability) Method and Risk Matrix (Case Study at Precast Concrete Company in West Java Area)

Dyah Setyo Pertiwi; Yohanes Dionisius Pangestu; Mohammad Ilman Abdul Patah; Riny Yolandha Parapat

doi:10.55927/cjas.v3i2.20

Penulis

Dyah Setyo Pertiwi Institut Teknologi Nasional Bandung
Yohanes Dionisius Pangestu Institut Teknologi Nasional Bandung
Mohammad Ilman Abdul Patah Institut Teknologi Nasional Bandung
Riny Yolandha Parapat , Institut Teknologi Nasional Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/cjas.v3i2.20

Kata Kunci:

HAZOP, Risk Matrix, Risk Analysis, Precast Concrete, Concrete Pouring

Abstrak

This study analyzes risks in the precast concrete pouring process at a West Java company using the HAZOP method and risk matrix. Key hazards identified include low radioactive waste levels, flow issues in feeding pipes, mixer speed absence, high drum transport speed, and added drum placement. These deviations risk leakage and blockages in mixing and disposal systems. The findings emphasize the need for strict monitoring to prevent equipment failure and enhance safety in off-drum mixing operations, supporting safer and more reliable cement compaction.

Referensi

Aven, T. (2016). Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(1), 1–13.

Duijm, N. J. (2015). Recommendations on the use and design of risk matrices. Safety Science, 76, 21–31.

Dunjó, J., Fthenakis, V., Vílchez, J. A., & Arnaldos, J. (2011). Hazard and operability (HAZOP) analysis: A literature review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 173(1–3), 19–32. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304389409013727

Fuentes-Bargues, J. L., González-Cruz, M. C., & González-Gaya, C. (2017). Hazard Identification of Chemical Process Industry through HAZOP Study. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 50,61-72. Gibb, A., Haslam, R., Hide, S., & Gyi, D. (2016). Construction industry safety: A review of current research. Construction Management and Economics, 34(9), 653–666.

https://www.iso.org/standard/51073.html

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753515000429

https://www.standards.doe.gov/standards-documents/1100/1100-BHdbk-2004

International Organization for Standardization. (2009). ISO/IEC 31010:2009: Risk management – Risk assessment techniques.

International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 31000:2018 – Risk management – Guidelines.

Khan, F., & Amyotte, P. (2017). How to make HAZOP more effective. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 47, 210–222.

Kim, Y. S., Lee, H. Y., & Kim, D. Y. (2015). Risk factors identification for precast concrete works using failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA). KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 19(6), 1734–1742.

Prasetyo, M. D., & Nugroho, A. T. (2022). Evaluasi manajemen risiko proyek konstruksi berbasis ISO 31000 pada industri beton pracetak di Indonesia. Jurnal Teknik Sipil Indonesia, 28(2), 97–108.

Rani, M. N., Siregar, R. A., & Taufik, M. (2021). Analisis kecelakaan kerja pada proses pengecoran beton pracetak di pabrik konstruksi. Jurnal Teknik Industri, 22(3), 215–224.

Silva, R., Santiago, I. R., & Coelho, R. D. (2019). Improving safety in construction with hazard and operability studies (HAZOP). Safety Science, 120, 574–583.

U.S. Department of Energy. (2004). DOE-HDBK-1100-2004: Chemical Process Hazards Analysis.

Wang, X., Li, H., & Tam, V. W. Y. (2020). Integration of HAZOP and risk matrix in prefabrication construction risk management. Automation in Construction, 112, 103093.

Yuliani, D., Hadi, S., & Firmansyah, R. (2023). Penerapan manajemen risiko berbasis HAZOP pada perusahaan konstruksi pracetak di Indonesia. Jurnal Rekayasa Konstruksi, 17(1), 45–56.

Zou, P. X. W., Zhang, G., & Wang, J. (2018). A guide for risk management in construction projects. Safety Science, 103, 236–249.