Legal Literacy about Cyberspace: Socialization at the Bukittinggi Class II Correctional Center
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/jpmf.v4i2.18Keywords:
Cyberspace, Digital, ITE Law, Information Technology MediaAbstract
This service output provides an understanding of legal literacy in the digital world (cyberspace). The object of this service is located at the Bukittinggi Class II Correctional Center, Agam Regency, West Sumatra Province with the target of the inmates of the Bukittinggi Class II Correctional Center. From the initial exploration, it was found that the inmates still had minimal knowledge about arrangements, policies, and practices (ethics/deeds) when in cyberspace. In fact, understanding of regulation, policy, and wisdom in cyberspace is still minimal. Methodically, this service is carried out in 2 (two) stages, including: In phase I, socialization is carried out and in phase II in-depth discussions are carried out. It was found in this service that the majority of the inmates did not know enough and were literate enough about legal literacy about cyberspace, especially in terms of regulations, policies, and obligations when binan residents accessed the digital world. This service contributes to improving legal literacy in cyberspace while contributing to shaping understanding for inmates when in cyberspace in the legal context.
References
Aditya, Z. F., & Al-fatih, S. (2020). Indonesian constitutional rights: expressing and purposing opinions on the internet. The International Journal of Human Rights, 0(0), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2020.1826450
Ardiputra, S., Ar, M. Y., & Iqbal, M. (2022). Sosialisasi UU ITE No . 19 Tahun 2016 dan Edukasi Cerdas dan Bijak dalam Bermedia Sosial. Jurnal Abdi Masyarakat Indonesia (JAMSI), 2(2), 707–718.
Aswandi, B., & Roisah, K. (2019). Negara Hukum Dan Demokrasi Pancasila Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM). Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 1(1), 128. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v1i1.128-145
Beitz, C. (2009). The Idea of Human Rights. Oxford University Press (OUP).
Christiano, T. (2011). An Instrumental Argument for a Human Right to Democracy. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 39(2), 142–146.
Fajri, H., Akmal, A. D., Saputra, B., Dt. Maani, K., Permana, I., Wahyuni, N., & Syafril, R. (2020). Peningkatan Keterlibatan Stakeholder Dalam Perumusan Peraturan Nagari Layak Anak. Dinamisia : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 4(4), 754–761. https://doi.org/10.31849/dinamisia.v4i4.4550
Hazmi, R. M. (2018). Konstruksi Keadilan, Kepastian, dan Kemanfaatan Hukum dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 46P/HUM/2018. Res Judicata, 4(1), 23–45.
Iryani, E. (2017). Hukum Islam, Demokrasi, Dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 17(2), 24–31.
Jahar, A. S., Hazmi, R. M., & Adhha, N. (2021). Construction of Justice, Certainty, and Legal Use in the Decision of the Supreme Court Number 46 P/HUM/2018. Jurnal Cita Hukum, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v9i1.11583
Mawaza, J. F., & Khalil, A. (2020). Masalah Sosial dan Kebijakan Publik di Indonesia (Studi Kasus UU ITE No . 19 Tahun 2016). Journal of Governance Innovation, 2(1), 22–31.
Mendel, T., & Solomon, E. (2011). Freedom of Expression and Broadcasting Regulation Freedom of Expression and Broadcasting Regulation Communication and Information. Series CI Debate, 8(February 2011), 7–18.
Rahmawati, N., Muslichatun, & Marizal, M. (2021). Kebebasan Berpendapat Terhadap Pemerintah Melalui Media Sosial dalam Perspektif UU ITE. Pranata Hukum, 3(1), 62–75.
Raz, J. (1986). The Morality of Freedom (1st ed.). Clarendon Press Oxford.
Reglitz, M. (2020). The human right to free Internet access. Journal of Appled Philosophy, 37(2), 314–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12395
Rohmy, A. M., Suratman, T., & Nihayaty, A. I. (2021). UU ITE Dalam Perspektif Perkembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi. DAKWATUNA Jurnal Dakwah Dan Komunikasi Islam, 7(2), 310–339.
Segura-Serrano, A. (2006). Internet Regulation and the Role of International Law. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nation Law, 10(1), 191–272.
Setiawan, M. N. (2021). Mengkritisi Undang-Undang ITE Pasal 27 Ayat ( 3 ) dilihat dari Sosio-Politik Hukum Pidana Indonesia. DATIN Law Jurnal, 2(1), 1–21.
Winarno, W. A. (2011). Sebuah Kajian Pada Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE). JEAM, X(1), 43–48.
Wulandari, C. (2021). Internet Blocking Policy in Indonesia : Between Realities , Pros and Cons ? ICILS, 01(July), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.1-7-2020.2303614
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Raju Moh Hazmi, Edi Haskar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


































